Abstract

This paper explores the application of three different port-folio formation rules using standard clustering techniques-K-means, K-mediods, and hierarchical-to a large financial data set (16 years of daily CRSP stock data) to determine how the choice of clustering technique may affect analysts’ perceptions of the riskiness of different portfolios in the context of a prototype visual analytics system designed for financial stability monitoring. We use a two-phased experimental approach with visualizations to explore the effects of the different clustering techniques. The choice of clustering technique matters. There is significant variation among techniques, resulting in different “pictures” of the riskiness of the same underlying data when plotted to the visual analytics tool. This sensitivity to clustering methodolgy has the potential to mislead analysts about the riskiness of portfolios. We conclude that further research into the implications of portfolio formation rules is needed, and that visual analytics tools should not limit analysts to a single clustering technique, but instead should provide the facility to explore the data using different techniques

Authors

Victoria Lemieux, Payam S Rahmdel, Rick Walker, BL Wong, Mark Flood

Year

2014

Journal

, 1–6.

Keywords

Computational Finance, Cryptography, Cryptology, and Finance

Leave a Reply